Love Potion - Happy Valentine's Day

Do things always work out in the end, for everyone? For the longest time we just don’t know. For the longest time it’s touch and go for all but the luckiest few. Things do not always work out in the end. As is true with the Capulet and her Montague. 

I think you should have access to a luck-in-love potion. I don’t usually even play with magic power, as I don’t believe in it enough to play, but love was an exception. I felt highly uncertain about love for much of my life. I was anxious to know how I was going to solve the problem of myself. Somewhere over all those varied years, I made a few love potions and rituals for myself and others. It was total play, but with the reasonable intent of changing how we felt.

I like to start from the mood of Shakespeare’s witchy spells. That means that without going so far as “eye of newt,” you conjure a weirdness. You want a for instance? Here’s one I’ve written just for you. It is a simple Love Please Come Again Potion*:

Into a small blue cup, mix a walnut shell’s worth of apple-cider vinegar with the amount of grape juice that would fill a hamster (I don’t mean satiate a hamster but fill the skin of one wherefrom the hamster had been removed). Add crumbs rubbed from the bottom of a slice of cake. Do not eat the cake. Add water until the cup fills above the rim. Say your love poem while carefully drinking this libation creation. Do not spill. When you have finished drinking, face east (if above the equator; if below, face north), and shake out the sillies. If you perform these acts with your whole heart, your love life will improve within forty-eight hours, or possibly longer, if it works at all.** Good luck.

[*If you’ve never been in love before, it’s the same potion but at the end you can eat the cake. **You can double the spell’s power if you take a shower and leave the house.]

The question of love poems to offer to people you are trying to seduce, ahem, people you have fallen in love with, is more complicated. Your beloved does not want a used love poem. There can be a poem that you share with many, ahem, friends, as long as you introduce it as a poem you have loved and shared for a long time. If you want to do something that makes a person feel that a poem is specific to him or her, I think you have to find a new poem. I know, I know. It’s all touch and go. So make a commitment to a poem and stay with it.

Literature can coax us through poetic experiences of love that are mighty instructive, and it is a curriculum hard to communicate in straightforward prose. It’s not just that people you trust will break your heart (they will); and that it doesn’t all work out for everyone (it doesn’t); and that when love does work out, it requires a remarkable degree of compromise (it does). It’s the degree to which we fail to understand the other person; the gulf of unknowing between us all. A love isn’t all about understanding. It’s about knowing and getting known anyway.

Two people don’t become one, brains don’t work that way, the motormouths that they are, they never stop inventing schemes of personal interest, and imaging the possibility of its own need for mistrust. Literature teaches us that everyone has such a chatty Cathy of a brain. They stream different kinds of chatter, very different sometimes, but here is what is always true: no one’s actions and thoughts match up neatly, whether it is because we are trying hard to be good, or because we are lying.

So it’s about getting to know and be known anyway. Let’s all go sit under the cherry trees in spring and tell each other our stories and let the petals grace us. The season of cherry-tree petals is a fast one, but it comes back every year.

Once again, all of the above is in the Love chapter in The Wonder Paradox, FSG, out in paperback March 5 with Picador. Happy Valentine’s Day!

love,

Jennifer

Bright Star - Let's walk through this iconic Keats love poem

It is hard to write a poem about romantic love that is both happy and any good. True love is fascinating from the inside, but frequently the experience looks a tad naive from the outside. When we are crazy about someone, and they are wild about us, we are true believers.

I can think of a few poems that center on that over-thrilled moment of new-love bliss. They solve the problem by being explicitly stuck in time. Sappho’s shivers of longing happen in the instant she is struck by hotness.

I think of the English Romantic poet John Keats as writing more about time than about love, but it came up a lot. His sonnet “Bright Star” is a best-loved love poem.

Bright star! would I were steadfast as thou art—

Not in lone splendor hung aloft the night,

And watching, with eternal lids apart,

Like Nature’s patient, sleepless Eremite,

The moving waters at their priestlike task

Of pure ablution round earth’s human shores,

Or gazing on the new soft fallen mask

Of snow upon the mountains and the moors—

No—yet still steadfast, still unchangeable,

Pillow’d upon my fair love’s ripening breast,

To feel for ever its soft fall and swell,

Awake for ever in a sweet unrest,

Still, still to hear her tender-taken breath,

And so live ever—or else swoon to death.

It is one sentence long and the volta, the change in argument, comes right in the middle, with a No. In the first half he says he wishes he could be Polaris, the bright star around which the whole sky seems to turn. He wants to timelessly watch Earth roll by. But No. Instead, he wants to stay forever with his head on his love’s breast, feeling it rise and fall with her breath. Presumably she’s asleep. He’s too excited to sleep. He decides that instead of the whole world as it ever changes, forever, he’d like just this breast, just this moment.

As with the other recent posts, all of the above is from the Love chapter in The Wonder Paradox, FSG, 2023, out in paper March 5.

Soon she'll be chasing... here's hoping

Love poetry is not at the center of contemporary poetry. One reason that love poetry makes many poets check for the exits is that we trust art that is about ambiguous feelings and romantic love poetry isn’t.

Much great love poetry, then, is partly about how difficult love is. Sappho is the great love poet of the ancient world; indeed, she is the great poet of the ancient world—she was called the greatest at the time. In one poem she is lovesick and prays for Aphrodite’s help. She imagines the love goddess appearing to say, of the longed for beloved,

if she’s escaping

Soon she’ll be chasing; if she’s refusing

your gifts, she shall give them.

Note the volatility. She is not wishing for love perfected, but for the vector of the chase to change direction. Let her chase me instead of me having to chase her. At the end of the poem, she wishes to be done with “this merciless craving,” and echoing Homer who lived a century before, she asks Aphrodite to be, once again, “my own helper in Battle.”

The above is from the love chapter of The Wonder Paradox: Awe, Poetry, and the Meaningful Life, FSG, out in paper March 5, on sale now in hardback. Yes we changed the subtitle, I loved the old one but this is better. I’m posting on love on the run up to Valentine’s Day.

love,

Jennifer

Eight Paradoxes of Love, a Quiz

Why is romantic love so difficult? Perhaps it’s the paradoxes. I can’t solve them, but I can attempt to sketch them.

Why don’t you assign a rating, 0, 1, 2, or 3, for each of these, to indicate how much of an issue the particular love paradox is for you, personally.

  1. The paradox of love is that it can be so intensely one-sided and can then switch sides.

  2. The paradox of love is that it comes with strong feelings of “forever,” and yet, often after experiencing these feelings, we leave.

  3. The paradox of love is that we want someone who fixes the wounds of youth, and yet we also fall for people who repeat those wounds and hence bring us to primordial passion.

  4. The paradox of love is that it is so ethereal and generous and yet so deeply embodied and hungry; angelic and yet animal.

  5. The paradox of love is that we know the ones we love, know them in a profound way, and yet we may lose the ability to see the way they appear to others.

  6. The paradox of love is that it can be so fixated on a single person out of billions, even over a whole life, and yet for many people it happens with a few different people over a lifetime. 

  7. The paradox of love is that when a romance is over, even when you want the affair to end, your body may choose to grieve it most grievously.

  8. The historic paradox of love is that in the history before modern times most people either had their spouse chosen by their parents or had choice, but it was limited by class and religion. You were always limited to the people you might possibly meet on foot, by travel, or connection. Until now, the problem of love has never been an abundance of choice. The paradox is that scarcity was a problem for love, and as it turns out, so is abundance.

If your number is sixteen or higher you are an intuitive, philosophical being with high love prospects. If your number is between fifteen and ten you know how to play the game, but you are above it, a prince among men. If your number is nine to five you are bright as a new penny but might want to look around a bit more. Those in the four to zero camp should see their counselor immediately.

Joking. The point of the numbers you gave these are to get a good look at what you are thinking and feeling now, and importantly, to come back to these paradoxes in a while and see if your concerns change and how static or dynamic are your feelings about love.

All of the above is from the Love chapter in The Wonder Paradox, which will be out in paper on March 5, and is on sale now in hardcover.

B Mine

When you are looking for a love poem to offer or to savor yourself, don’t be troubled if you don’t agree with everything the poem says—or seems to be saying—about love. You can offer the whole poem but specify that it is the charm of a single apt phrase that made you share it.

The truth is, it’s better if the poem you share has parts that disturb you. Go ahead and pretend they don’t exist when you are giddy in love. The other parts of the poem will come in useful when a bad romance day hits us with its cricket bat of sadness.

By the same broken token, when choosing a poem for your own savoring, it is much better if the poem bothers you in spots. Those irritants change over time and remind you of your former selves in ways that are otherwise unlikely to happen. You can’t map a projection forward without charting a few plot points. Plot a few chart points.

All of the above is from The Wonder Paradox, the chapter on Love and choosing a single love poem as Your love poem. The paperback will be out on March 5, and the hardcover is on sale, nearly half off. Or try the audio! Running up to Valentine’s Day I intend to post on Love.

Thanks for reading.

—Jennifer

What is YOUR "I want" song?

Hi All!

It’s February, the time of the year that can stall even the most stalwart of engines. But the birds in Brooklyn today are loudening up the clouds with one of those hopeless song explosions they do now and again, with everybody chirping and nobody listening. To be alive today is to be chirping or not chirping, listening or not listening, it’s unusual to just “be” without reference to the interwebs one way or another. What are we all saying? What is the chirping about? Life is a musical but we are all playing the lead and we all have our own “I want” song. You know the idea that in musicals the lead roles each begin with an “I want” song – a song that tells us what we are looking for, what the stakes are, what’s stopping us.

It’s interesting to think about what an “I want” song does to a show, and to a life. In a show it drives the bus of the narrative. Once you’re on the bus, you pretty much know where you are going. The bus offers a lot, but it also limits. Once your identity is locked in an I want song about winning a football scholarship, it’s hard to see what else you might have sung about. Our dreams come from somewhere, surely innate personal taste accounts for some of it–the dull of tongue often aren’t chefs- but we can also assume that childhood influences both conscious and subconscious, are what defines what we want. It can be changed.

In life we sometimes get what we want, but often when change comes, we just get a new I want song. I’m sure I’m not alone in getting sick of the sound of my own chirping of wanting. I’d rather be the fake Wizard of Oz, handing out hearts to lovelorn animatronics, and explaining to young people the power of good shoes, etc, than to be one of Dorothy’s crew, all hungry for something they can describe in one word. Maybe it would take the pressure off our one top goal if we took on another. It feels like asking for a lot. If I want my art to be discovered, according to musical logic, I shouldn’t also desperately want to find my long lost sister. How to not get stuck on a bus? Ride two buses at once. Not possible in reality, but normal in the poetic. Which is where we are.

Anyway, I just felt like saying hello. The paperback of my new book, The Wonder Paradox, comes out March 5, so I’m intending to be writing here more often, mulling over ideas. The Wonder Paradox is made of clear writing and ideas but is also willing to start new thoughts, even if they are strange at first. 

If you read this, let me know where you are in the world? Do you have an “I want” song?

Bye for now!

Jennifer

Matthew Zapruder and I Talk Wonder and Poetry

Matthew Zapruder and I talk about our new books on LITHUB! We wrote questions back and forth for a month or so. A really generative and fun conversation. His new book is Story of a Poem and there is a lot of overlap between our subjects. How do you say what you don’t know yet? How do we find out about who we are and what the world seems to be? Poets try. All artists perhaps try this way and that, throw away a lot, keep what feels true, and don’t always resolve the problem when opposing things feel true. Poets especially seem to move forward in this paradox-preserving way. Poets have ways of dismantling old metaphors that can rule the way we think about whole fields of knowledge and remembering to ask further questions of many varieties.

Good Morning Edition

I’m on NPR’s The Morning Edition today for World Poetry Day! I spoke to them about these wonderful words by Rainer Maria Rilke from his book Letters to a Young Poet:

“Be patient toward all that is unsolved in your heart and try to love the questions themselves, like locked rooms and like books that are now written in a very foreign tongue. Do not now seek the answers, which cannot be given you because you would not be able to live them. And the point is, to live everything. Live the questions now. Perhaps you will then gradually, without noticing it, live along some distant day into the answer.”

Well, they didn’t use that part, but I’ll leave it here for your enjoyment. In the Introduction to The Wonder Paradox I wrote about how this Rilke quote changed my life. Enjoy!